BLUE BOOK HELP!! Legal Memo?

Question

I'm writing a legal memo using the Blue Book for citations. I can't find the rule explaining how to cite when I'm using specific examples from two different cases in one sentence.

Thanks for helping - if you just happen to know the rule # that would be extra helpful.

Answer 1

I cannot remember how the rule goes; it has been a while. Nevertheless, I hope one or more of these sites help. You can also check Westlaw and/or Lexis Nexis.



http://www.legalbluebook.com/Public/BlueTips.aspx



http://www.law.cornell.edu/citation/



http://www.law.cornell.edu/citation/full_toc.htm



http://www.lawyeringskills.com/books/appendixb.pdf



http://www.suite101.com/reference/legal_writing



http://www.law.utk.edu/course-materials/fall2009/20094_805_Looper_285.rtf

Answer 2

Seriously? You are worried approximately "your potential" whilst answering a experiment query? Arguably, the instructor can say its his or her knowlege considering they taught you. Unless that is a few sort of step forward system that may be patented or anything, you don't have any authorized declare to the "product" because it have been. Actually, you normally wouldnt have even though that have been the case There isn't any agreement among you and the instructor with admire to make use of of the experiment expertise. Of path, you COULD refuse to reply questions in writing someday. But then, your ebook might normally have just one letter in it. EDIT: Sorry, however I appreciate the query. The nonetheless isn't any agreement with admire to the instructor preserving your paintings. If a agreement is silent as to a time period, the time period isn't incorporated. There isn't now nor has there ever been an implied agreement among instructor and pupil with admire to the instructor's potential or proper to hold your paintings. If you desire your "potential" to be legally yours, you have got to copyright it. Blue books don't seem to be copyrighted. You don't have any declare right here.

Answer 3

Maybe you are putting too much into one sentence.